SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Engineer shares 4-field logging schema that exposes AI agent failures standard logs miss

0
·4 views

A software engineer discovered that their production AI agent pipeline was silently hiding failures despite logging every prompt, tool call, and response — because the logged fields were structured for cost analysis rather than failure detection. The issue surfaced when an agent completed a 14-step task confidently but had fabricated three of the steps, with standard logs showing no errors. After 12 weeks of iteration, the engineer developed a four-field schema requiring each step log to capture expected outcome, observed outcome, a verification check, and an uncertainty signal. These fields directly address three recurring failure modes: silent HTTP failures masked by a parsed response, fabricated successes from partial results, and gradual confidence drift across multi-step tasks. The schema, shared publicly, replaces truncated and status-only logging with full-fidelity, severity-derived records that can surface fabrication before it reaches production.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why Human Skills Still Matter in the Age of AI Automation

Developer Cesar Aguirre published a short opinion piece on DEV Community on July 6 arguing that tasks AI can complete in minutes should no longer be considered special skills. The article targets beginner and experienced developers navigating the growing influence of AI in software development. Aguirre suggests that professionals need to focus on capabilities that go beyond what AI tools can easily replicate. The piece is framed as practical advice for thriving amid the current AI hype in the tech industry.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How PostgreSQL Handles a Backend Process Crash and Why It Drops All Connections

When a PostgreSQL backend process crashes, the database engine does not isolate the failure to just that session. Because all backend processes share critical memory areas — including shared buffers, lock tables, and transaction status data — PostgreSQL cannot guarantee the integrity of those structures after a crash. As a safety measure, the postmaster immediately terminates all active connections and initiates automatic recovery before accepting new ones. A demonstration using Docker and pgbench showed that connected clients received warnings about the crash and were instructed to reconnect after recovery. This behavior is an intentional design feature of PostgreSQL, prioritizing data consistency over session continuity.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How Postgres FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED solves concurrent resource allocation

A developer building StashMe, a digital cloakroom management system for venues, encountered a race condition where multiple simultaneous check-ins could assign the same coat hanger to different guests. The naive SQL approach of reading then writing allowed two transactions to claim the same row before either could lock it. Postgres's FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED clause, available since version 9.5, resolves this by having concurrent queries skip rows already locked by other transactions rather than waiting on them. This allows multiple check-ins to proceed in parallel, each claiming a distinct free hanger with no queuing or deadlocks. The same pattern underpins popular Postgres-based job queue libraries and can be applied broadly to any system distributing finite resources under concurrent load.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Learns ACME Protocol Basics After Debugging HTTPS Certificate Failures

A developer encountered repeated HTTPS certificate issuance failures while deploying an application using Caddy as a reverse proxy and Let's Encrypt for SSL certificates. Despite correct DNS records, open firewall ports, and proper Caddy configuration, certificates consistently failed to issue. The root cause turned out to be a networking problem that prevented Let's Encrypt from reaching the server during ACME domain validation — not a misconfiguration in Caddy or TLS itself. The ACME protocol requires Let's Encrypt to actively validate domain ownership by contacting the applicant's server, a detail the developer had initially overlooked. Reading ACME logs and following a structured checklist — verifying DNS, checking external port reachability, and confirming challenge responses — ultimately resolved the issue and highlighted that certificate failures often stem from underlying network problems.