SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Divorce Does Not Erase Joint Loan Liability, Lenders Still Hold Both Parties

0
·13 views

When a married couple takes a joint loan, both partners are legally bound to the lender regardless of their personal relationship. A divorce settlement is a private agreement between spouses and holds no bearing on the original loan contract. The lending institution can hold either or both parties responsible for repayment of outstanding EMIs. If one spouse stops paying, the lender can pursue the other for the full dues, impacting their credit score and finances. Couples going through separation are advised to address joint loan obligations explicitly during the divorce process to avoid future financial liability.

Read the full story at NDTV

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
IndiaTimes of India ·

Finnish city fills old gravel pit with 100 million gallons of water to store heat

The Finnish city of Hyvinkaa is undertaking a large project to fill a former gravel pit with 100 million gallons of water. The water will serve as a thermal energy store. Once operational, the facility is expected to supply about a quarter of the city's heating needs during the colder months. Construction is set to run until late April 2027. Charging of the system is expected to begin by late summer 2027.

0
IndiaNDTV ·

Loni, Just 30 km From Delhi, Records Among the World's Highest Air Pollution Levels

Loni, a town in Uttar Pradesh about 30 km from Delhi, has been recorded as one of the most polluted places in the world. Over the past 12 months, its average PM2.5 concentration was 112.5 micrograms per cubic metre. That level is more than 22 times the annual limit of five micrograms recommended by the World Health Organisation. The figures highlight the severity of air quality problems in the town and its surrounding region.

0
IndiaTimes of India ·

Ex-selector questions India's decision to bat KL Rahul at No. 6 in ODI

KL Rahul's batting position became a topic of debate after India's second ODI against New Zealand. Former selector Krishnamachari Srikkanth criticised the team for sending Axar Patel in ahead of Rahul. Axar scored only seven runs, while Rahul appeared comfortable at the crease. Srikkanth argued the decision was unfair to Rahul. Sunil Gavaskar, however, defended the move, saying promoting a left-hander can disrupt the rhythm of bowlers.