Developer Uses Six-Round Rotating Adversarial Review to Stress-Test AI Agent Design

A software developer devised a structured six-round adversarial design review process before deploying a new AI agent built to deliver deterministic, auditable verdicts on whether to adopt libraries, models, or tools. To avoid the blind spots of a single reviewer evaluating its own work, three distinct groups — a personal agent fleet, a coding assistant, and an external multi-model verification pool — rotated through three roles: Questioner, Answerer, and adversarial Verifier. All six possible role-to-group assignments were fixed before the first round began, preventing any group from steering later rounds toward an easier position. The agent's eight core components were each judged across six dimensions, including completeness, reliability, and alignment with the system's stated purpose. The approach was designed to ensure no single reviewer held permanent judging authority, addressing a structural weakness common in AI-assisted code review.