SShortSingh.
TopTechnologyAI & MLStartupsProgrammingScienceBusinessFinanceCrypto & Web3World
Back to feed
Programming

Developer tests word-count floor fix for writing linter bug, finds it addresses different issue

0
·2 views

A developer published an analysis of a writing linter's scoring system last week, revealing padding could artificially inflate scores. A reader suggested implementing a minimum word count floor to prevent short fragments from being misjudged as full essays. The developer tested this by applying different floor values to the scoring algorithm's denominator. The floor successfully fixed a bug where very short texts received meaningless extrapolated scores, but it did not address the original padding vulnerability because the developer's own posts were all above the tested thresholds.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Open-source AI app WildQuest encourages outdoor exploration with offline prompts

WildQuest is an open-source AI field guide application designed to encourage users to spend time outdoors. The offline-first app generates five types of gentle outdoor activity prompts based on available time, location, and energy level. Developed as a static mobile-first web application, it operates without requiring accounts or storing personal data on external servers. The application features an open architecture allowing connections to local AI models like Qwen or Llama, with deterministic fallbacks for offline use.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Author rethinks shelf-life for claims after reader critique highlights flawed premise

A writer proposed labeling published claims as unverified after a set period, such as 90 days. A reader argued this approach is flawed because a claim's validity changes not with time, but when someone with opposing incentives tries and fails to falsify it. The author's own recent corrections showed errors that were wrong from the moment of publication, which a time-based system would not catch. This led the author to conclude the core issue was a lack of independent, adversarial review, not the passage of time. The writer now acknowledges most published claims may remain permanently provisional without such external scrutiny.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

DEV Community API lacks DELETE; unpublishing done via PUT published:false

A user discovered that the DEV Community API does not have a DELETE endpoint for articles. Instead, articles can be unpublished by using a PUT request to set 'published' to false, a method not documented in the official API guide. The user tested this by creating a probe article and found unpublished articles return a 404 error on the public endpoint but remain listed in the author's unpublished view. This behavior means a 404 response can indicate an unpublished article rather than a deleted or non-existent one. The user plans to use this method to resolve duplicate articles on their blog.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

AI Vision Models Inconsistently Flag Safe Images as Dangerous in Kaggle Test

A researcher submitted findings to a Kaggle benchmarking challenge showing that six AI vision models were tested with a safe photo. Two of the models incorrectly classified the harmless image as dangerous. The experiment was conducted by Clivin John and reported on October 9. This highlights potential reliability issues in automated image moderation systems. The results were shared as part of a community challenge focused on AI and machine learning benchmarks.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community