Developer Seeks Community Testers for SharePoint Effective Access Audit SPFx Web Part

·2 views

A developer has submitted a read-only React-based SPFx web part called Effective Access Audit to the PnP SharePoint Framework repository for community review. The web part displays direct role assignments for a SharePoint site and optional list, showing principal details, role names, and permission scope without modifying any permissions. Local testing is complete, with five Jest tests, TypeScript, ESLint, and webpack builds all passing successfully. The developer lacks access to a live SharePoint Online tenant and is asking community members to validate real-world behavior, including how role assignments, scope labels, and error states appear. Feedback and tenant screenshots are requested via the open pull request on GitHub.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Developer Builds Automated Pentest Suite to Stress-Test His Own macOS Security App

Tetsuharu, developer of the macOS network-security app RoamSwitch, created an automated penetration testing suite to check whether new code updates introduced security regressions. Rather than risk destabilizing his primary machine, he used Tart, a lightweight macOS virtualization tool, to run tests inside a disposable macOS Sonoma virtual machine. The suite probed five defense boundaries, including XPC authorization, packet filter rules, port exposure detection, and ARP gateway consistency. Key results confirmed that the privileged root helper correctly rejected unauthorized XPC callers, the Air-Gap firewall rules enforced a fail-closed policy, and globally exposed ports were detected and shielded as expected. The approach offers a repeatable, low-risk method for security regression testing across app releases.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

AWS IAM Explained: How Users, Groups, and Roles Control Cloud Access

AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a service that controls who can access resources within an AWS account, eliminating the need to share root credentials. IAM Users are individual identities created for people or applications, each with their own credentials, while IAM Groups allow administrators to assign permissions collectively rather than one user at a time. IAM Roles function like users but carry no permanent credentials; instead, they issue temporary, auto-expiring access tokens to services such as EC2 or Lambda that need to interact with other AWS resources. This approach is considered more secure than hardcoding access keys, since temporary credentials reduce the risk of long-term exposure if a system is compromised. Together, these three IAM components provide a layered, least-privilege framework for managing access across an AWS environment.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

New Apify Actor Converts BetterStack Status Pages Into Structured JSON Data

A new tool published on the Apify Store allows developers to extract data from BetterStack (Better Uptime) status pages in a standardized JSON format. The actor retrieves key details for each component, including its status, availability, description, and last status date, eliminating the need to write custom parsers per vendor. Users can configure the tool via query string, result limits, and optional enrichment or change-monitoring flags. It can be triggered through the Apify Console, REST API, or exposed as an MCP tool for AI agents. Pricing follows a pay-per-result model, meaning users are only charged for the records they actually retrieve.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Scrum Teams Could Benefit From Linter-Style Prevention Over Sprint Reporting

A software development opinion piece argues that most agile tools function as recording instruments, surfacing problems only after a sprint has already failed, rather than preventing them in real time. The author draws a parallel between code linters — which block invalid actions at the moment they occur — and how Scrum workflow tools could be redesigned to enforce process rules upfront. Key examples include blocking a sprint from starting without a defined goal, preventing backlog items from skipping workflow states, and requiring all Definition of Done criteria before a card reaches Done. The piece outlines three core linter principles — encoding rules in the tool, blocking invalid actions rather than flagging them, and catching failures at the earliest possible point — and maps each to Scrum practice. The central argument is that shifting from reactive dashboards to proactive guardrails reduces the cost of process failures and removes reliance on team discipline alone.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community