Developer Ports Pong Wars Visual Demo to Commodore 64

·1 views

A developer has ported the popular Pong Wars visual simulation to the classic Commodore 64 home computer. The project, shared on Hacker News, is documented on Imran Nazar's personal website. Pong Wars is a mesmerizing bouncing-ball demo where two sides compete to claim territory on a divided screen. The port demonstrates the capabilities of the decades-old C64 hardware in running modern viral programming concepts.

Read the full story at Hacker News

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

GitHub Launches Agentic Autofix for Code Scanning Alerts in Public Preview

GitHub released an agentic autofix feature for code scanning alerts in public preview on July 10, 2026, designed to automatically generate patches for identified vulnerabilities. The system moves each alert through multiple stages — from candidate patch generation through build, testing, security checks, and human review before any merge. Experts caution that simply measuring the percentage of alerts with a generated patch is a misleading success metric, as generation is only the first of many critical steps. A structured evaluation framework is recommended, using deterministic canary assignments, detailed failure classification, and predeclared reliability gates to ensure patches genuinely resolve security issues without introducing regressions. Broader deployment should be justified by bounded evidence and explicit safety checks rather than surface-level averages.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

GitHub Adds Security Review Feature to Copilot App, Raising Research Questions

GitHub announced on July 14, 2026, that security review functionality is now available within the GitHub Copilot app. A proposed research protocol has been outlined to evaluate how effectively users engage with this feature, focusing on whether reviewers inspect evidence, challenge findings, and appropriately escalate uncertainty rather than simply accepting suggestions. The protocol uses synthetic repositories with deliberately mixed findings — some relevant, some misleading, and some omitted — to test decision-making quality across different reviewer roles, including specialists, maintainers, and less-experienced users. Key metrics include how often unsupported claims are challenged, whether evidence is cited in decisions, and how correctly participants escalate unresolved issues. Researchers caution that acceptance rate alone is not a valid success measure, as low acceptance could reflect healthy skepticism, and that lab conditions cannot fully replicate real-world security review pressures.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

GitHub Mobile Can Now Trigger Copilot to Resolve PR Merge Conflicts

GitHub announced on July 8, 2026 that its Mobile app can initiate a Copilot cloud-agent workflow to address pull-request merge conflicts. The process follows a structured sequence: a mobile user delegates the task, the agent proposes a patch within defined boundaries, and a human performs the final merge after review. Experts caution against assuming a single tap fully resolves conflicts, stressing that the agent's scope should be explicitly limited to specific file paths while blocking changes to workflows, deployment configs, and policy files. Before handing off to the agent, users should confirm repository details, branch revisions, expected file scope, required checks, and the designated reviewer. Passing CI checks alone is insufficient — a human must semantically review each conflict resolution choice before the patch is merged.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

GitHub Expands Copilot BYOK Support in JetBrains With Accessibility Test Plan

GitHub announced on July 14, 2026, that Copilot for JetBrains has expanded its bring-your-own-key capabilities. Alongside this update, a proposed accessibility test plan was outlined to evaluate keyboard and screen-reader usability for the provider and model selection workflow. The plan treats provider and model selection as a dependent workflow rather than two independent dropdowns, meaning a chosen provider determines which models become available. Key testing criteria include stable focus during dynamic refreshes, clear announcements of state changes, and the prevention of invalid provider-model pairs from being submitted. The plan is not a review of existing defects but a structured matrix to guide future accessibility validation across various interaction, announcement, and state-correctness scenarios.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community