Developer Finds 20x Statistical Error in AI Ad-Testing Agent That Never Triggered an Alert
A developer auditing their AI-powered ad-testing agent, Mia, discovered it had been sizing A/B tests at roughly one-twentieth of the required sample size due to misapplied statistical shorthand. The textbook formula prescribed 1,111 users per test arm, while the correct calculation for a 1.9% click-through rate demanded 22,278. Because statistical underpowering produces no runtime errors or failed assertions, the system continued returning confident winners throughout — some of which were likely false. A separate issue compounded the problem: three-arm tests were evaluated at a raw p-value threshold of 0.05, inflating the true false-positive rate to around 14%, meaning roughly one in seven declared winners did not actually exist. The developer has since updated Mia to use the exact unpooled formula at the observed base rate and applied Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in