SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Developer Builds Same CI/CD Test Pipeline in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins

0
·1 views

A developer published a public repository demonstrating the same pytest-based test pipeline written separately for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins, allowing direct syntax comparisons across all three tools. The pipeline covers a shopping-cart calculator with 10 tests, including happy paths, error paths, and parametrized cases, and publishes a JUnit report on each run. The project also includes a broader comparison of nine CI/CD platforms — including CircleCI, Travis CI, TeamCity, Bitbucket Pipelines, Tekton, and Harness — evaluated on hosting model, configuration style, pricing, and standout features. The author argues that tests running only locally protect just the individual developer, while automated CI/CD pipelines on every push or pull request protect the entire team. The repository is publicly available on GitHub for teams evaluating which CI/CD tool best fits their workflow.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How Java For Loops Work: A Simple Beginner's Breakdown

A for loop in Java allows developers to repeat a block of code a set number of times without writing it manually each time. The loop consists of three key parts: an initialization that sets a starting counter, a condition that controls when the loop stops, and an increment that updates the counter after each cycle. In a basic example, a loop starting at zero and running while the counter stays below five will execute exactly five times. Each iteration prints the current counter value, producing output from zero through four. Understanding this structure is considered a foundational step in learning Java programming.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Builds Multiplayer Game API from Cameroon After Scrapping 3D Game Dream

A software developer based in Cameroon set out to build a Free Fire-style 3D multiplayer game but abandoned the project after hitting complex architectural limits beyond what tutorials could teach. The experience prompted him to ask why embedding multiplayer games into apps requires an entire engineering team, leading him to conceive Beta Gamer, a Games-as-a-Service API. The platform allows developers to integrate real-time multiplayer games into their products without handling WebSocket architecture or game logic themselves. Building it solo was grueling — financial instability, power outages, and unreliable mobile data repeatedly halted progress, and he found no collaborators he could afford to pay. Despite pressure to ship early, he chose to build a scalable matchmaking engine correctly from the start, even though it extended the timeline significantly.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

New tools blur the line between analytical and transactional databases

Traditionally, running heavy analytical queries on the same database host as transactional workloads was considered a dangerous anti-pattern, as a single reporting query could exhaust system memory and crash core applications. Extensions like pg_lake are challenging this limitation by decoupling storage into cloud data lakes using Apache Iceberg and routing analytical workloads to an isolated background process powered by a vectorized DuckDB engine. This architecture separates the OLAP execution path from transactional operations, preventing resource contention between the two workload types. The approach involves distinct scheduling strategies, contrasting macro-distributed query engines with micro-morsel processing engines. The development signals a broader shift in data engineering toward unified platforms capable of safely handling both operational and analytical demands.