Developer builds Pong clone in TypeScript using Raylib without a game engine

·1 views

Brazilian frontend developer Patrik built a functional Pong clone using TypeScript and Raylib, a C-based graphics library ported to JavaScript, without relying on any game engine. Since the Node.js port lacked proper documentation, he used Claude AI to generate a translated and searchable reference guide from the official Raylib docs. He manually implemented all core game systems — including collision detection, physics, and visual rendering — effectively building a minimal custom engine from scratch. The game itself was coded entirely without AI assistance, as Patrik wanted to test his own abilities using only documentation and patience. The project is available on GitHub and reflects his broader journey from rural self-taught hobbyist to working professional in web development.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Zoviz MCP Server Lets Claude Generate Logos and Brand Kits via Conversation

Zoviz, an AI branding platform, has launched a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates directly with AI assistants like Claude, Cursor, and Windsurf. The server allows users to generate logos, color palettes, typography guides, social media assets, OG images, and print-ready brand packages entirely within a chat interface. Users connect the server by adding a custom connector in Claude Desktop or claude.ai using Zoviz's MCP URL, then authenticate once for reuse across environments. The tool is designed to eliminate the need for separate design software, letting developers and freelancers iterate on brand assets conversationally during the same session they are building a product. MCP access is bundled with Zoviz subscriptions starting at $29 per month, with no additional API charges.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How the 1994-1996 Encryption Wars Shaped the Future of Digital Privacy

Between 1994 and 1996, a fierce ideological and technical battle unfolded over who would control encryption on the emerging public internet. On one side stood government intelligence agencies seeking surveillance access; on the other were cryptographers and activist 'Cypherpunks' who argued that strong encryption was essential to individual freedom. The conflict had roots in earlier competing visions of networked computing, including the decentralized ARPANET built in the United States and the Soviet Union's failed OGAS project, which sought centralized state control over information flows. These divergent philosophies — distributed autonomy versus hierarchical oversight — set the ideological stakes for the encryption debate that erupted in the mid-1990s. The outcome of this period would fundamentally determine whether digital communication would remain private or become subject to state-mandated monitoring.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How Android Developers Can Build Low-Latency AI Vision Apps Using Edge Hardware

A technical guide published on DEV Community outlines how to build high-speed AI vision analyzers on Android devices by leveraging the heterogeneous hardware found in modern mobile System on Chips. The approach treats the CPU as an orchestrator rather than the primary compute unit, offloading neural network inference to the NPU and image pre-processing to the GPU to avoid costly data transfers. A DSP can serve as a low-power gatekeeper, triggering the NPU only when complex analysis is needed, thus conserving battery. The guide also highlights a shift in Android AI architecture, noting that Google's AICore and Gemini Nano move model management from individual apps to the system level, addressing earlier problems with large bundled model files inflating APK sizes. Key implementation patterns are written in Kotlin and target the CameraX framework to minimize the time between a camera frame being captured and an inference result appearing on screen.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Uber's AI Coding Costs Soared Because Engineers Always Used the Priciest Models

Uber exhausted its 2026 AI coding budget within four months, with one executive spending $1,200 in a single two-hour Claude Code session and heavy users reaching $2,000 per month. The company responded by imposing a $1,500 per-engineer monthly spending cap, but critics argue this treats the symptom rather than the root cause. Analysis of AI coding usage suggests only about 15–20% of tasks genuinely require expensive frontier models, while the remaining 80% can be handled adequately by mid-tier or lightweight models. A model-routing approach — directing complex architectural work to frontier models and routine tasks like boilerplate or unit tests to cheaper alternatives — reportedly cut one team's monthly API bill from roughly $10,000 to $3,000 without sacrificing output quality. Spending caps risk backfiring by pushing engineers to conserve budget on simple, high-value tasks while overspending on complex ones, making intelligent task-level routing a more effective long-term solution.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community