Developer Builds Local-First Multi-Agent Platform Using Strands, Ollama, and MCP Gateway

·60 views

A developer has built a local-first agent platform in Python that allows a single AI agent to access travel, finance, and entertainment capabilities without being directly coupled to each tool's implementation. The architecture uses Strands Agents for orchestration, Ollama for running a local language model, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to define a clean tool contract between the agent and domain servers. A central MCP gateway sits between the agent and multiple focused domain servers, hiding backend topology and making it easier to add or update individual domains independently. The design enforces three key constraints: the model runs locally, the agent connects to one stable tool endpoint, and each domain owns its own small MCP server. A FastAPI backend and Streamlit interface handle user interaction, while agent profiles are managed through a central registry that separates agent behavior from tool implementation.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Hacker News links to 1960 Science article on a 'doomsday' date in 2026

A Hacker News post links to a 1960 article from the journal Science, published under the title 'Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026.' The item contains only the title and link, with no article text available to confirm the article's specific arguments or claims. The post received 6 points and no comments at the time it was captured. The date in the title is a calendar reference that the 1960 piece projected as a doomsday scenario. Readers should consult the original Science article for its full content.

0 comments Read more at Hacker News

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

JANISSARY: A Differential DAST Tool Aimed at Verified, Actionable Security Findings

A developer is building JANISSARY, a differential Dynamic Application Security Testing tool designed to make security testing results more meaningful and evidence-driven. The project separates initial discovery of unusual application behaviour from the verification of actual vulnerabilities. Its stated principles include transparency about whether outcomes are verified, unproven or inconclusive, and prioritising useful findings over sheer volume. The developer plans to share progress, technical decisions and lessons learned publicly via GitHub as the tool evolves.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

INFINITT PACS System Manager Flaws Allow Local Privilege Escalation and Code Execution

CERT/CC published advisory VU#203719 on November 2, 2026, describing two code execution vulnerabilities in INFINITT PACS System Manager versions 3.0.11.3 and 3.0.11.5. The first, CVE-2026-16305, stems from weak file permissions on execlist.txt, which a low-privileged local user could modify so that an approved update runs added commands with administrative privileges. The second, CVE-2026-16306, affects the imodular:// URI handler in IModular.exe, which executes commands from crafted links without validating them, letting an attacker run code with the user's privileges when a victim opens a malicious link. INFINITT Healthcare lists versions 3.0.12.3 and 3.0.12.5 as fixed. The advisory reports no evidence of exploitation, but administrators are advised to check versions, file permissions and URI handler registration on PACS workstations. Interim measures include restricting local logons and shared use, limiting reachable network shares and blocking malicious URI links where possible.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Supreme Court to Hear Apple's Appeal in Epic Games Contempt Case

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on January 11, 2027, in Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc. The case concerns whether Apple should be held in civil contempt for allegedly violating the spirit of a court injunction that removed its commission on purchases made outside the App Store. Apple contends the injunction's wording did not explicitly bar commissions on external sales, while Epic argues the continued fees undermine the order's purpose. The Court will not decide whether Apple may charge such commissions, an issue still pending in lower courts. The ruling could set a precedent for how injunctions against major tech platforms are interpreted.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community