Developer breaks down why event-driven architecture beats polling in algorithmic trading
A software developer published a technical breakdown on DEV Community comparing naive polling-based market-making code with an event-driven, WebSocket-based alternative for high-frequency trading (HFT). The article explains that REST polling approaches introduce 150–250 milliseconds of latency, making them unsuitable for millisecond-scale trading strategies. The author argues that the key differentiator in HFT is not programming language choice but architectural decisions such as avoiding blocking calls, eliminating unnecessary data copies, and using asynchronous I/O. Side-by-side Python code examples illustrate how switching from timed HTTP requests to real-time WebSocket streams significantly reduces the delay between receiving market data and placing an order. The piece concludes that an event-driven pipeline — where the system reacts instantly to incoming data rather than querying on a fixed schedule — is the foundation of competitive low-latency trading systems.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in