DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM Compared: A 47-Million-Request Stress Test Breakdown
A software architect conducted a large-scale technical evaluation of four major Chinese AI models — DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM — routing approximately 47 million requests through them via a unified API over the past quarter. The tests focused on real-world performance metrics including latency, throughput, cost, and reliability under bursty, multi-region workloads. DeepSeek's V4 Flash emerged as the top pick for raw throughput and cost efficiency at $0.25 per million output tokens, while Qwen offered the broadest model range starting as low as $0.01 per million tokens. Kimi's K2.5 led on reasoning and Chinese-language tasks but carried the highest price tag at $3.00 per million tokens, and GLM stood out for Chinese-language quality with competitive budget options. All four models support the OpenAI-compatible API protocol, making it straightforward to switch between them without rewriting application code.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in