Dantiva got its first paying customer. Then the product changed again

·2 views

Two days ago I published a technical account of building Dantiva and wrote that paid demand had not been confirmed. That sentence is already out of date. The first confirmed purchase arrived on 17 September. On 21 September a customer bought the first monthly Start subscription through the Telegram Mini App. These are small transactions, not traction disguised as a chart.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

tf-nag: offline AWS Solutions checks for Terraform plans

tf-nag is an offline Python CLI that checks Terraform plan or state JSON Rule IDs and severity levels are derived from the upstream AWS Solutions pack: https://github.com/cdklabs/cdk-nag. tf-nag is published on PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/tf-nag/. Install it with pip: pip install tf-nag tf-nag --version Or run it without installing, using uvx: uvx tf-nag --version To pin a specific release in a pipeline: pip install tf-nag==0.1.0 To work on tf-nag itself, clone the repository and install its development uv: git clone git@github.com:vumdao/terraform-nag.git cd terraform-nag uv sync --group d

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

My Lovable site looked finished. Google could read one language out of four

I often say that Lovable is great for the first version of a website. On RoboHub, a robot comparison catalog I built last week, I saw exactly where that first version ends, so here is the breakdown: what Lovable did well, what I had to redo, and how long it took. Lovable built the catalog in a few hours. Filters by category, payload and runtime, a page for every robot, a comparison table that highlights the best values, a quote form, four languages. Good enough to show a client.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How to Test and Debug an MCP Server: From the Inspector to Automated Tool Tests

Testing an MCP server through an AI client is a slow way to work. You type a natural-language prompt, hope the model picks the right tool, watch it fill in arguments, and if anything fails you cannot tell whether the bug is in your server, the model's reasoning, or the prompt. Every layer of that stack is nondeterministic except yours. Test yours first, deterministically, and leave the AI out of it until the protocol surface is provably correct. The protocol makes this easy.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Best AI Mock Interview Tools for Software Engineers in 2026 (prices checked, from someone who built one)

I built DevInterview.AI, so I have an obvious bias. I also spend a lot of time on these tools, and most "best AI mock interview tools" lists are written by people who haven't opened half of them, with prices that are a year stale. So here's the comparison I'd want, with every price checked on the vendor's own site on September 30, 2026, and the places where someone else is the better pick called out. You want unlimited reps with a voice interviewer: DevInterview.AI, $19.99 a month, first interview free. You want a human who has run real hiring loops: interviewing.io, from $179 a session.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community