BlazePhoenix Computes DEX Swap Routes On-Chain to Remove Off-Chain Trust

·11 views

BlazePhoenix is a DEX aggregator on Base, Ethereum, Optimism, Arbitrum and Robinhood Chain that computes trade routes inside the executing transaction rather than on a private server. Unlike typical aggregators, it has no off-chain router that users must trust, since pool state can shift between quote and execution. The contract enforces a minimum-out amount, returns any execution surplus to the user, and sources prices from a Quoter contract that anyone can verify via a plain eth_call. The project is pre-launch, with an independent external audit scheduled before release, and it offers an SDK and an MCP server for AI agents.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Why AI Zombie Love Story Videos Are Spreading Fast on Social Media

A viral autumn 2026 format, the zombie love story, shows a partner turned into a zombie while the other chooses to embrace them anyway. The trend took off after filmmaker Aytech Ashkhamakhov posted the short AI film "CHOICE" on Instagram in mid-September 2026, and many viewers initially mistook it for a real movie scene. Its shareability comes from a fixed three-beat structure with personalized faces, an emotional rather than gory tone, and a built-in tag-your-partner loop. A DEV Community write-up explains that typical photo-to-video pipelines detect and validate faces, transform one identity into a zombie while preserving recognizable features, and animate per-scene keyframes before stitching segments and adding audio. The article argues that template-driven tools with strong narrative structure tend to outperform open-ended prompt interfaces for mainstream users.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Agencies Face Outage Liability When Clients Pay Vendors Directly

Agencies are increasingly managing websites and digital assets whose vendor bills are paid directly by clients on their own cards. When those payments fail, the service can lapse even though the agency had no control over billing. Clients often choose this split-billed setup to satisfy procurement rules, avoid ownership concerns, or keep invoices in their own legal entity. Vendors typically limit third-party access so that managers can administer assets but cannot update payment methods. As a result, agencies may still bear the blame, reputational damage, and emergency work when an outage occurs.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Claude Code Shipped Nine Releases in Eight Days, Outpacing Third-Party Interfaces

Claude Code published nine versions between October 1 and October 8, 2026, according to the npm registry, with further releases on October 9 and 14. OpenAI's Codex CLI also shipped four stable releases in five days during the same period. The article notes that new interface features, such as keyboard shortcuts, pickers and terminal status signals, appear in the vendors' own terminals on the day they ship. Tools that re-render these agents through scraped output or the SDK must redesign their screens to match, so they tend to trail the official releases. The author argues that this lag is structural rather than a one-off problem.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Retrained AI Models Can Shift Medical Device Risk Profiles Faster Than Static Risk Files Track

A regulatory professional recounts a review meeting where no one could say how a recent quiet retraining of a software medical device would have been caught by the existing risk documentation. The author argues that a risk management file is a point-in-time snapshot, while learning models change continuously, so scheduled reviews leave gaps. Changes such as subgroup performance drift, upstream labeling shifts, or inference-stack dependency updates often fall outside formal change control and generate only log entries. The piece points to standards including ISO 14971, IEC 62304, the EU AI Act, and the FDA's Predetermined Change Control Plan guidance as expecting risk to be linked to changes, ideally continuously. The author suggests triggering risk reviews from telemetry and committing in advance to a PCCP protocol that defines permissible model changes.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community