Benchmark Study: Bifrost Outperforms LiteLLM for Enterprise AI Gateway Use

A security and operations engineer compared two open-source AI gateways, Bifrost and LiteLLM, using an open-source benchmarking tool on a shared-CPU VPS with four vCPUs and no real provider keys. At 100 requests per second, Bifrost's median latency was 1.01 ms versus LiteLLM's 5.84 ms, a gap that widened significantly at higher loads. At 1,000 RPS, LiteLLM dropped 5.1% of requests and recorded a p99 latency of nearly 34 seconds, while Bifrost maintained 100% success with a p99 of just 2.62 ms. Beyond raw speed, the reviewer noted differences in security defaults, memory usage (60 MiB vs 2.08 GiB at rest), and licensing, with Bifrost using Apache-2.0 and LiteLLM's enterprise features under a separate license. The author concludes Bifrost is the stronger enterprise choice, while recommending LiteLLM for teams already extending it in Python or operating well below capacity limits.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.



Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in