SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Benchmark reveals macOS Gatekeeper slows parallel AI agent workflows, not daily use

0
·1 views

A developer running AI coding tool Codex with parallel agents on a MacBook Air noticed significant slowdowns and built a small benchmark to identify the cause. The culprit was not Gatekeeper itself but the repeated launching of executables from many new file paths, which forced macOS to assess each one fresh. In tests, launching copies of a binary from 50 new locations jumped completion time from near-instant to roughly 11 seconds, while repeatedly launching an already-trusted binary remained fast. Attempted system-level workarounds like lowering syspolicyd process priority and restarting the daemon provided no meaningful relief. The author concluded the practical fix is to avoid unnecessary executable path churn and pre-warm new tools before deploying them across parallel agents, rather than disabling Gatekeeper entirely.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Builds Python Bot to Automate LinkedIn Easy Apply Job Applications

A developer has created an open-source Python tool called LinkedIn Easy Apply Assistant that uses Selenium to automate repetitive job application tasks on LinkedIn. The CLI-based tool reads user configuration, logs into LinkedIn, searches for Easy Apply listings, fills standard form fields, uploads a CV, and logs completed applications to avoid duplicates. The project was motivated by the tedious, repetitive nature of online job hunting, where applicants repeatedly enter the same personal details across multiple listings. Built-in safeguards include a dry-run mode, rate limiting, duplicate tracking, and manual handling of CAPTCHAs to keep the process human-supervised. The developer emphasizes the tool is intended as a personal productivity aid, not a spam mechanism, and the source code is publicly available on GitHub.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

AI Sales Assistant Cut Proposal Time but Fractured Team Dynamics, Manager Finds

A sales manager integrated an AI assistant with their CRM, product documentation, and win/loss data to support proposal drafting, call preparation, and objection handling. Over 18 months, average proposal turnaround dropped from four days to one and a half days, and the tool proved effective at surfacing historically grounded responses to buyer objections. However, the most significant and unexpected impact was on internal team dynamics, as senior reps felt their accumulated expertise had been commoditized without their consent, leading some to withhold documentation. The manager acknowledges the deployment was treated as a technology project rather than an organizational change, with no structured conversations about how senior roles would evolve. The key lesson drawn is that before deploying AI on knowledge tied to specific individuals, leaders must proactively address those people's concerns and redefine their roles accordingly.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

DedrooM: Open Source Proxy Tackles Loop Detection and Context Bloat in Claude Code

A developer has released DedrooM, an open source proxy tool designed to address two common inefficiencies in long Claude Code sessions. The tool monitors repeated tool calls using an adaptive window and automatically blocks commands when the agent appears stuck in a loop. It also compresses accumulated tool output — such as file listings, logs, and diffs — that lingers in context after it is no longer needed, helping reduce token usage. DedrooM is compatible with several AI coding agents including Codex, Aider, Cursor, Cline, and OpenCode, and can be installed via a single pip command. The project is licensed under Apache 2.0 and is available on GitHub, with the developer noting that real-world savings will vary depending on workload and session type.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Open-Source CRMs Like Twenty and EspoCRM Gain Ground as HubSpot Costs Bite SMBs

Small and mid-sized SaaS and e-commerce businesses are increasingly reconsidering commercial CRM platforms like HubSpot and Salesforce after per-seat pricing costs begin to outpace other core infrastructure expenses combined. A developer-focused analysis compares open-source and headless CRM options — including Twenty and EspoCRM — against custom-built solutions for engineering-led teams of 5 to 200 seats. Beyond cost, key pain points driving the shift include rigid data schemas that don't fit non-standard business models, limited API access on lower-tier plans, and data sovereignty concerns particularly relevant under GDPR in the EU. The comparison targets product-led companies where the CRM is one component of a broader technical stack, explicitly excluding enterprise procurement, regulated industries, and ERP-hybrid deployments. Direct database access is highlighted as a practical advantage for teams building automated workflows or AI-driven features on top of customer data.