Benchmark Pits CognoDB Against Four Graph Databases on Free-Tier Hardware
A developer ran identical queries across five managed graph databases — CognoDB Cloud, Memgraph, Neo4j Community, ArangoDB Oasis, and FalkorDB Cloud — each on its smallest available free tier. The benchmark used a dataset of 7,000 people, 2,800 products, and roughly 56,000 relationships, with nine query types covering lookups, traversals, recommendations, path-finding, aggregations, and writes. Neo4j AuraDB Free was excluded because its signup process required billing details, violating the benchmark's no-credit-card rule. Self-hosted engines like Memgraph and Neo4j Community delivered faster raw query speeds, largely because they ran on the same machine as the test client. The author emphasizes that hardware asymmetry is the most common flaw in database benchmarks, and publishes all code and raw results on GitHub for independent verification.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in