AI ROI Debate Misses the Point — Adoption Is Already Happening Quietly
A growing debate over AI's return on investment is dominating boardrooms, with reports citing that 56% of CEOs see no ROI and 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots show no measurable return. However, a closer look at MIT data reveals a striking gap: 90% of employees already use personal AI tools for work, even though only 40% of companies have an official AI subscription. Analysts argue this mirrors how email was adopted — organically and without formal ROI studies — before becoming indispensable to daily work. Much of AI's value is concentrated in routine, unglamorous tasks like drafting emails, summarizing threads, and cleaning up notes, none of which appear as revenue line items. Experts suggest that rather than chasing large transformation metrics, companies should measure smaller, honest indicators like time-to-first-draft or inbox processing time to better capture AI's real impact.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in