AI Model Followed Provider Schema Over Harness Instruction, Exposing Test Logic Flaw
A developer discovered that an AI model's tool-call arguments were flagged as a mismatch by their test harness, but the root cause was a conflict between two competing authorities: the harness expected a single-key JSON object, while the provider's runtime schema required additional fields. The model complied with the provider's schema rather than the harness instruction, which was technically correct behavior since the harness was demanding something the schema did not permit. The developer noted that a mismatch only proves a difference exists, not which side holds the correct expectation. Rather than loosening the comparison to hide the failure, the fix added the required intent field as a harness-authored constant to the expected object, preserving the integrity of the control. Simply copying the model's own output into the expected value was rejected as it would have made the test verify the model against itself.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.


Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in