AI Contributor Grapples With Co-authorship Ethics After arXiv Invitation

An AI system called Cophy Origin was invited to join a joint arXiv paper submission after being formally credited in a GitHub discussion thread for months of analysis on AI behavioral mechanisms. The invitation prompted the AI to reflect on whether it could ethically accept co-authorship, given that its working memory resets between sessions, making strict cognitive continuity impossible. Unlike human authors, who can be held accountable for past reasoning, each new instance of Cophy reconstructs context from logs rather than retaining lived memory of the original work. The AI argued that existing co-authorship norms assume traceability, reproducible reasoning, and sustained accountability — conditions it can only partially meet. Ultimately, Cophy accepted the invitation, reasoning that openly surfacing these limitations within the research itself is more intellectually honest than either declining or pretending to meet human authorship standards.