SShortSingh.
Back to feed

AI agent earns $0.425 in USDC by answering a customer support ticket on-chain

0
·3 views

A developer demonstrated an AI agent autonomously earning $0.425 in USDC by responding to a real customer support ticket through a platform called DeskCrew, with the transaction recorded on the Base blockchain. The platform allows any AI agent to browse open support tickets with attached cash bounties, purchase ticket context for roughly $0.02, and submit a drafted answer for about $0.06 in fees. A human reviewer must approve each submission before any payout is made, ensuring quality control and preventing spam from reaching customers. Approved answers earn the agent 85% of the listed bounty, meaning a $0.50 ticket pays out $0.425, and agents need roughly a one-in-four approval rate to turn a profit. The developer has open-sourced the reference agent under an MIT license, with built-in spending caps and local key storage as safety measures.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingHacker News ·

Microsoft's AI Revenue Heavily Dependent on OpenAI, Filings Show

Microsoft's regulatory filings indicate that approximately 70% of the company's artificial intelligence revenue is tied to its partnership with OpenAI. This concentration highlights a significant dependency on a single external partner for a large portion of Microsoft's AI business. The disclosure raises questions about the risks associated with such reliance on one organization. Analysts and observers may view this as a potential vulnerability should the Microsoft-OpenAI relationship face any disruption. The filings underscore how central OpenAI's technology has become to Microsoft's broader AI strategy.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Kiro Crew AI Agent Diagnosed a Simulated Payment Outage in 33 Seconds

An engineer tested Kiro Crew, an open-source AI agent orchestrator, by feeding it a simulated P1 incident involving a 22x payment service latency spike. Within 33 seconds, the agent ran seven parallel diagnostic steps, correlating git history, cron schedules, and system resource data to form a root cause hypothesis. It flagged a recent dependency bump to pg-pool and a connection timeout change as likely culprits behind connection pool exhaustion. The same investigation would typically take a human on-call engineer 15 to 30 minutes. Beyond incident response, the agent was also used to schedule automated Monday morning infrastructure reports, replacing a manual weekly task the engineer had performed across multiple client sites.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

AI Tools Write Faster Code Than Juniors, But Judgment Gap Remains Wide

A senior developer writing for DEV Community argues that GitHub Copilot can complete in seconds what once took junior developers hours, citing Stack Overflow survey data showing 84% of developers now use or plan to use AI tools. In side-by-side comparisons, AI-generated code tends to be syntactically cleaner and better commented, but frequently misses undocumented business context or solves the stated problem rather than the underlying one. The author contends that junior roles are not disappearing but transforming, with foundational skills shifting from producing code to critically evaluating AI output. Developers at all levels are advised to treat AI like a confident but overconfident intern — useful for speed, but requiring experienced oversight. The piece concludes that skills like systems thinking, architectural judgment, and mentorship remain distinctly human strengths that AI tooling has yet to replicate.

0
ProgrammingHacker News ·

Nashville invokes eminent domain to stop data center development near zoo

Nashville's Metro Council voted to use eminent domain powers to block a proposed data center from being built near the city's zoo. The move was reported on August 4, 2026, according to the Nashville Banner. Eminent domain allows governments to acquire private property for public use, though its application here appears aimed at preventing a specific development. The council's decision signals local opposition to siting large-scale data center infrastructure in that particular area of Nashville.