6 Reasons People Still Visit Websites Despite AI Answering Most Queries

·59 views

A data-backed analysis published on DEV Community in September 2026 examines why web traffic has not disappeared despite the rise of AI-powered search. Research from Pew Research Center found that pages featuring AI Overviews receive only 8% click-through rates compared to 15% on standard results, while SparkToro data showed just 374 out of 1,000 searches result in an external website click. However, analysts argue the data signals a shift in user intent rather than the end of web browsing, with Google reporting AI Mode users now conduct searches three times longer than traditional queries. Websites offering interactive tools, real-time data, verifiable original sources, and direct transaction pathways retain strong traffic because AI cannot fully replicate those functions. The article concludes that web publishers who focus on utility, timeliness, and accountability are better positioned to attract the users who still choose to click through.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Fixing a Slow Database: Work Up the Scaling Ladder Cheapest-First

The article argues that a slow database should be fixed in a deliberate order rather than jumping straight to sharding, which is costly. It recommends first confirming the real cause and adding indexes, then adding a cache such as Memorystore for repeated reads, then using read replicas for read-only traffic. Scaling the instance to a larger machine type comes next, with attention to brief restarts, replica sizing and retry logic. Sharding is reserved for cases where the single primary remains the write bottleneck, and measurement is advised at every step.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Avatar Metadata Search: Keep Object Storage for Bytes, Catalog for Queries

The article argues that object storage should hold avatar bytes under immutable, addressable keys, while content type, tags, ownership, and moderation state belong in a queryable catalog. Bucket prefix listing suits repair and audit tasks but cannot efficiently evaluate predicates such as type plus tags within a tenant. The author notes that declared Content-Type headers are only hints and should be verified by inspecting the payload with a bounded decoder. A catalog row with explicit ready, pending, and failed states can bridge the lack of atomic commits between database and bucket. The piece also names failure modes such as orphan objects, dangling rows, duplicate retries, and stale current pointers.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Paperspace alternatives in 2026: Nodus, RunPod and Kaggle compared

A comparison article lists Nodus for training runs that have outgrown a notebook, RunPod for cheap per-second GPU pods, and Kaggle Notebooks as a free option for students. The author notes Nodus lists H100 access at $2.60 per GPU-hour versus $5.95 on Paperspace and restores the latest checkpoint on a replacement machine if one is lost. Paperspace, now part of DigitalOcean, still offers notebooks under its Gradient-branded plans, with free machines that carry six-hour shutdown limits and H100s requiring support approval. The article is written by a Nodus builder, who discloses this and says every competitor claim links to its own pricing page. Prices were checked on November 11, 2026.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Retrying Tenant-Isolated Thumbnail Uploads: A Storage Decision Record

The article argues that each tenant's thumbnails should be stored under a deterministic, tenant-scoped key, with retries limited to transient failures using exponential backoff. Every attempt of one logical upload should reuse the same idempotency key so retries do not create duplicate artifacts or cross tenant boundaries. The author frames the real cost as operational, covering implementation time, duplicate objects, rate-limit recovery, reconciliation, and tenant attribution rather than per-request pricing. It recommends a private object store and compares S3, Cloudflare R2, Alibaba OSS, and Infrai on the failure boundaries each team must be able to operate. The piece stresses that exactly-once behavior should be designed through idempotent writes and deterministic reconciliation rather than assumed from the network.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community